Newscast Media HOUSTON, Texas—Once again, before I continue with this article, I would like to briefly describe multiple personality disorder or dissociative identity disorder (DID). This is a mental disorder in which two or more relatively independent personalities appear to exist in one person. Only one personality is evident at any one time, and the alternation of personalities usually produces periods if amnesia in the personality that has been displaced. This disorder begins in childhood with most reporting their first alternate personality before the age of twelve. (Abnormal Psychology, p. 177)
Mothers with this disorder also report that it interferes with their child rearing. One stated, “Sometimes I forget that I am a mother. I feel somebody dropped off their kid for me to babysit and never picked her up” (Benjamin, Benjamin & Rind, p. 340). Another one said, “If the angry part is in control of me, it causes friction and tension with the kids. It’s hard to tell them that I didn’t mean it” (p.342).
I didn’t do it
A South Carolina woman who had twenty-one different personalities asked for spousal support payments during a divorce, claiming she did not commit the adultery that caused the divorce. She said the responsible person was a personality inside her called “Rosie” whom she tried to stop from committing the act, but Rosie wouldn’t listen. (In South Carolina, adultery is grounds for divorce).
In the case of the two violent girls who ran into traffic and later on one stabbed a man to death who tried to help her… because the defense psychologist said it was a different personality that did the stabbing, and the “good girl” who was in court was innocent, the judge found it difficult to sentence the person before him. He was forced to hand down a five-year sentence to the violent personality, and next year, the girl will be released from prison. The victim’s family thought the sentence did not fit the crime since they lost their brother, and the person who committed the crime would be out on the streets in less than five years.
The making of a super human
After the World War II, when the U.S. captured Nazi scientists, they discovered that their prisoners weren’t just ordinary men, they had extraordinary skills and were so technologically advanced. The Nazi scientists were then recruited to America under what was known as Project Paperclip, who then shared their secrets and research with the Americans.
Among the many areas of expertise, one of the most intriguing ones was in the behavioral sciences, particularly hypnosis. There is no doubt the Project MKULTRA in which the CIA learned mind-control techniques, was a bi-product of the revelations made by the German scientists. As I’ve written before, in the research study by investigative journalist Walter Bowart called Operation Mind Control, he details how people can be programmed through hypnosis to commit crimes and then forget they had done so.
This once again creates conflict in the area of science where the general rule is: “Do no harm”. If a human being’s mind can be hijacked to do acts against the conscience, then that is harmful to that person because there is no informed consent on the part of the one who is being controlled.
On Sunday March 11, a U.S. soldier went on a killing spree and killed 16 Afghan civilians, and ABC news reported: “Investigators are trying to learn what set off an Army veteran of three tours in Iraq who left his base in the middle of the night and methodically massacred 16 Afghan civilians.”
Yet after the incident, the soldier returned calmly to the base and turned himself in. The question is, what set him off? We may never know since the records are sealed, but that is an example of a super soldier in the making. Now imagine if an entire battalion were made up of super soldiers, who feared no fear, and were programmed to annihilate their enemies. You wouldn’t have any prisoners or war. Once again we see conflicting forces. On the one hand, some could reason that super soldiers are more effective, on the other hand, it would be in violation of Nuremberg Code.
The Nuremberg Code states that, “A person should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.” Read or download the entire Nuremberg Code here.
Now you see me, now you don’t
As I’ve previously written in an article concerning the cryptocracy, the most dangerous breed of scientists are Behavioral Engineers. These are behavioral scientists who are not out to change the world but to make man adjust to it. Behaviorists are looking for is a genetic factor which controls anger, docility, and other personality tendencies. What’s dangerous about this field, is that they have an unholy alliance with biochemists, and are capable of producing supernatural, or paranormal syntheses.
The most scary and one of the tightly-held top secret projects is one that can make an object dematerialize (disappear) and then rematerialize in another location. This should not be confused with “bilocation” where a person can travel and be in two locations at the same time. It should also not be confused with “teleportation” some refer to it as astral projection, which is a phenomenon where a person can travel outside his or her body to another location. Both of these are very dangerous, yet people, especially those involved in the occult engage in this practice. They do it primarily for power and for sexual reasons.
For example, there are people who report having incubus attacks during sleep. This is whereby someone is at the point of falling asleep, all of a sudden, the individual feels paralyzed and cannot move, scream or open the eyes. The person feels an external force has taken over his or her body and is helpless. Some people report having these incubus attacks when they are wide awake. They are not imagining them…they’re happening in real time. Find out the causes of incubus attacks>>
Categories: News Tags: Do No Harm, Incubus attack, Informed consent, MKULTRA, multiple personality disorder, night terror, nightmare, Nuremberg code, Operation Mind Control, sleep paralysis, Succubus attack
Newscast Media LOS ANGELES, Calif—Over the weekend I was bombarded with phone calls about the recently-signed Trespass Bill and the executive order issued by Obama on National Defense Resources Preparedness. So for the sake of my readership, I will tackle both topics in this series. As usual, because I have no affiliation to either Democrats of Republicans, and as an independent journalist, I will present both sides in this series. There have been protests about the Trespass Bill because the language implies that someone could end up being arrested by law enforcement, upon entering an area that is protected, yet the person arrested is unaware of any such federal protections.
The bill in part states: “Whoever—(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so; (2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions. . .shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) is—(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both. . .” You may read or download the entire Trespass Bill here.
There have been several protests even from Obama’s supporters urging him to overturn the bill. Some believe, the bill is targeting the Occupy Wall Street movement to stifle free speech. CNN also widely covered this issue and the protests that emanated as a result of the Trespass Bill in this article.
If we take a look at the Tea Party movement that was operational between early 2009, and peaked in 2010, thereafter became docile, then compare it to the Occupy Wall Street movement that has only been active for about seven (7) months there is a big difference. If this really had to do with Obama preventing protestors from assembling and muzzling their free speech, the perfect time to do it would have been in 2010 during the mid-terms when the Tea Party was at its best. Yet they were allowed to pursue their political ambitions that cost Obama and the Democrats the mid-term elections. On the other hand, the Occupy Wall Street has recently been created and heavily supported by liberal Democrats, the liberal media and Hollywood celebrities, yet the Trespass Bill is perceived as targeting the OWS movement. Why is that so? Would Obama allow the Tea Party to function without attempting to shut them down, then shut down Occupy Wall Street, yet he himself was once a community organizer? Wouldn’t he be going against the grain since he is a promoter of activism?
I believe there is a much deeper reason than most people realize. To begin with, the OWS movement had an affinity for violence. Countless reports about rogues and criminals committing crimes intentionally have been reported. You did not see this with the Tea Party. They seemed methodical in their M.O. Anyone working in and around a federal agency would be concerned about the safety of his or her life, considering the aggressive and hostile behavior that has been exhibited at some of these public OWS events. The president himself would also be concerned about his safety considering the number of people who have tried to scale the White House fence but were tackled by the Secret Service. Some of these people might have a predisposition to committing violent acts, or might be neuro-linguistically programmed to harm others.
There is an out-of-print book by investigative journalist Walter Bowart called Operation Mind Control that details how people can be programmed to commit crimes against high-ranking officials. You won’t find this book in any American bookstore because the CIA purchased all known copies due to its controversial nature. The used ones being sold online go for over $250-plus.
In his book, Bowart talks about how we are living in a Cryptocracy. “It is the plan of a secret bureaucracy—what I call a cryptocracy—which conspires against our laws and our freedoms. “Cryptocracy” is a compound of crypto, meaning “secret,” and -cracy, meaning “rule, government, governing body.” The cryptocracy, then, is the secret government whose identity and whereabouts have slowly and reluctantly been hinted at by the Congress through its investigations into Watergate, the CIA, and the rest of the intelligence community,” Bowart says. (page 24) Part II: Uproar by Obama-understanding the mysteries>>