AIDS Hoax: The truth behind the virus that never was
3D Model of DNA Strand by Joseph Earnest using 3D Studio Max
by Joseph Ernest December 28, 2010
Newscast Media -- It has been dubbed the incurable disease caused by an elusive virus called the HIV/AIDS virus. However, scientists have presented compelling evidence showing that HIV/AIDS is nothing more than a pseudo-science hoax and the real culprits are the AIDS medications like AZT that do more harm than good.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determined that every case of AIDS includes one of the 29 pre-existing illnesses that were defined by the CDC. These include the three additional conditions namely: Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Pneumonia and Cervical cancer that were added on October 28, 1992. James Curran, CDC's associate director for AIDS justified the addition by saying, "We expect this expansion to result in more comprehensive monitoring of the epidemic of HIV infection and related disease in the United States." Click here to download entire 16 page PDF. *(See Page 9 for full list.)
What is most remarkable is that the addition of just those three categories brought in an additional 160,000 HIV-infected people who were not yet seriously ill and were not now considered to have AIDS. With these additions Virologists, researchers, and clinics can now receive huge grants and funding for research. We can therefore make the inference that AIDS is not a new disease, it is simply a collection of designated illnesses already known to the scientific community and the general public.
Notice that none of the 29 AIDS illnesses are new and none appear exclusively in people who test positive for HIV antibodies.
A good example is the flu vaccine which could also render you HIV positive. A control study of 101 blood donors who had been vaccinated against influenza and 191 matched controls showed that recent inoculation with any brand of influenza vaccine was significantly associated with a false positive screening assay for HIV antibodies. Guidelines of both Johns Hopkins and the New York State Department of Health list influenza vaccination as a known cause of indeterminate results on Western blotting for HIV antibodies. On March 30, 2006, the New England Journal of Medicine published an article titled "Influenza Vaccination and False Positive HIV Results" You may read the article in its entirety. (pop-up)
You will be surprised to learn that there has never been an actual photograph released showing what this make-believe virus looks like. I challenge any scientist to produce an image of a "stand-alone" AIDS virus that is original from an AIDS patient. (Not the computer generated images on the Web.)
Not a single one of the colorful pictures originated directly from one single AIDS patient! They ALL originated from complex cell cultures prepared in various laboratories. All these images shown to us of fake AIDS viruses with antennae eating healthy cells are simulations of what scientists believe the virus does and how it replicates. The pictures and images you see are all computer generated. I personally can use my multimedia knowledge to generate a 3D model and animation using 3D Studio Max, or Maya or Poser or Rhino, and produce such animations. That's how I created the DNA strand above.There is nothing special or genius about that.
The reason you don't hear much about this is because journalists tend to shy away from scientific topics and would rather pursue political or community events. If they do launch an investigation into a scientific subject, they normally are directed to the Public Relations department where they are fed pseudo-science, and such reports don’t expose the true lies behind the fraud being committed.
In the 80s when AIDS was allegedly discovered, Max Essex a colleague of Dr. Robert C. Gallo of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, came up with a colorful theory that AIDS originated from monkeys. Max Essex of the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, claimed that the virus was linked to one found in African green monkeys. On page 245 of the journal Science dating back to April 20, 1985, Essex hypothesized that the AIDS virus made its way into Africans who ate or were bitten by primates infected with a closely related virus.
Robert C. Gallo then made a name for himself when his lab, at National Institutes of Health and another the lab of researcher and French scientist Luc Montagnier at the Pasteur Institute in Paris-began working to track down the cause of the mysterious disease striking homosexual men. The first to publish results was Montagnier, who described finding a virus he dubbed LAV in an AIDS patient in May 1983. Montagnier, however, stopped short of claiming it was the cause of AIDS. In April 1984, Gallo went further. He announced that he had identified a virus-which he called HTLV III-and proposed it was the cause of AIDS. Gallo also reported developing a test to detect it in blood.
A lawsuit was filed by the Frenchman who believed Gallo had used his sample to falsely take credit for his work. Gallo and Montagnier agreed to share equally the credit for discovering the AIDS virus. Part of the settlement was to create a new name for the virus. Gallo’s HTLV-III (human T-cell lymphotropic virus) and Montagnier’s LAV (lymphadenopathy associated virus) became HIV (human immunodeficiency virus).
On May 25, 1995 the Albany Times Union reported that this same Gallo was offered $12 million in incentives, to establish a virus research center in Baltimore, Maryland. As you can see there is a serious conflict in interest. How can Gallo possibly deliver objective results with such vast sums of money pouring into his lab? When fellow scientists objected to what they viewed as an arrangement by Gallo and the state driven by profit, Gallo lashed out and said, "I can do whatever I want. The state asked us to form a company to create jobs and fund the institute. If I made profit out of it, would that be wrong? Absolutely not."
In October 2008 Gallo was snubbed for a Nobel prize which was awarded to Luc Montagnier and Francoise Barre-Sinoussi. The reason was obvious.
In his book How A Virus That Never Was Deceived The World, Neville Hodgkinson a leading medical journalist in the UK demonstrates and asserts , "HIV is not a virus but a collection of gene products that can appear when immune system cells are chronically stimulated in the body or drastically manipulated in the laboratory. No two identical HIVs have been isolated, even from the same individual."
Andrew Neil’s column in the UK Sunday Times dated June 23, 1996, reads, "AIDS has become an industry, a job- creation scheme for the caring classes: at one stage there were three times as many AIDS counsellors as AIDS victims . . . . the duplicity of the AIDS establishment has been fatal. Hundreds of millions of pounds that could have been spent on far greater risks to life – such as breast cancer – from which more die every year than have died of AIDS in 14 years – was siphoned off and squandered. Money that should have been targeted at the real risk groups was spread uselessly across the population instead."
On April 3, 2000, South Africa’s President Mbeki wrote Clinton this letter disputing the findings of AIDS. Mbeki argued that HIV does not cause AIDS and that treatment with drugs such as AZT does more harm than good. This five-page Mbeki letter shocked Washington, they thought it was a hoax. It was leaked to the Washington Post that printed it on April 21, 2000, later the New York Times printed its analysis of the letter on May 14, 2000 explaining that the letter was not a hoax, Mbeki meant everything he said.
Dr. Peter Duesberg a professor of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California, Berkeley, who isolated the first cancer gene through his work on retroviruses in 1970, explained so eloquently to an AIDS panel on June 22, 2000 why HIV does not cause AIDS and why Mbeki had a problem with the numbers from the CDC.
"In Africa 23 million HIV-positives generate per year 75,000 AIDS patients, ie. 1 AIDS case per 300 HIV-positives. But in the US, 0.9 million HIV-positives (WHO, Weekly Epidemiological Record 73, 373-380, 1998) now generate per year about 45,000 AIDS cases (Centers for Disease Control, 1999), ie. 1 AIDS case per 20 HIV-positives.
Thus the AIDS risk of an American HIV-positive is about 15-times higher than that of an African! Since over 150,000 healthy HIV-positive Americans are currently treated with DNA chain-terminating and other anti-HIV drugs (Duesberg & Rasnick, 1998), and since American HIV-positives have a 15-fold higher AIDS risk than African HIV-positives, President Mbeki must be warned about American advice on "treatments" of HIV-positives.
The discrepancies between African AIDS and infectious disease, and the discrepancies between the high AIDS risk of American compared to African HIV-positives can both be readily explained by the hypothesis that AIDS is caused by non-contagious risk factors and that HIV is a harmless passenger virus."
AZT and AIDS Medications The Culprits:
AZT is a toxic chain terminator of DNA developed 30 years ago as cancer chemotherapy drug. Duesberg's research indicates that the long-term consumption of recreational drugs (such as cocaine, heroin, nitrite inhalants, and amphetamines) and prescriptions of DNA chain-terminating and other anti-HIV drugs, cause all AIDS diseases in America and Europe that exceed their long-established, national backgrounds, i.e. >95%.
Chemically distinct drugs cause distinct AIDS-defining diseases; for example, nitrite inhalants cause Kaposi's sarcoma, cocaine causes weight loss, and AZT causes immunodeficiency, lymphoma, muscle atrophy, and dementia. The anti-HIV drug cocktails are failing in the US. A front page article of the New York Times, showing dying AIDS patients, issued a first warning in August 1997: "Despite powerful new AIDS drugs many are still losing battle (NYT, August 22, 1997). By September 1997 the American press already reported that "AIDS drug cocktails fail 53%" (San Francisco Examiner, September 29, 1997).
In regard to whether condoms protect against AIDS Dr. Duesberg says, "The Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta were the first to publish in 1989 in the New England Journal of Medicine that it takes about 1,000 unprotected sexual contacts with an HIV-positive person to become positive. The CDC's numbers are based on thousands of "discordant" hemophilia couples, in which the husband was positive from a transfusion and some of their wives became positive over time. Recent studies on homosexual couples, other heterosexual couples and singles have confirmed the CDC's original number.
With regard to the question about the usefulness of condoms in preventing AIDS my answer is twofold: (1) Since AIDS is caused by drugs, not by HIV, condoms do not prevent AIDS. (2) However, since many doctors prescribe DNA chain terminators such as AZT as anti-HIV drugs to healthy HIV-positives, and since DNA chain terminators cause AIDS - condoms are useful after all. They protect people who have an average of 1,000 sexual contacts with HIV-positives from infection, and thus from AIDS caused by anti-HIV medication."
As for the difference between African AIDS and American/European AIDS Duesberg says, "The African AIDS epidemic has only one thing in common with the American/European AIDS epidemic - the name. African AIDS is caused by malnutrition, parasitic infection and poor sanitation. There are no risk groups in Africa, like drug addicts and homosexuals. It is for this reason that African AIDS is equally distributed between the sexes. Moreover, practically no African AIDS patients have pneumocystis pneumonia, dementia or Kaposi's sarcoma - the signal diseases of AIDS in the US and Europe. Above all, African AIDS is diagnosed without even attempting an HIV test, which is too expensive for Africa. Thus there is no scientific evidence for the correlation between HIV and African AIDS, only guesses."
False Positives and lawsuits filed
On August 13, 2004, The Oakland Tribune reported that for eight years, a 59-year-old war veteran was led to believe he was HIV-positive. After living with what he thought was the virus for almost a decade he went to the Department of Veterans Affairs' Oakland clinic, and his doctor told him that he actually isn't HIV-positive and presumably never has been.
The Chicago Sun-Times reported on December 18, 1994, that for nearly a year, a Florida man lived day to day, not sure when he would get sick and die, after he was falsely diagnosed as being HIV positive. He said people treated him "like nuclear waste." Friends in his suburban Fort Lauderdale community wouldn't shake his hand. Many "always had an excuse" not to see him. The diagnosis stunned him. He says he hadn't engaged in risky sex or drug use. But it wasn't until almost a year later - after his friends abandoned him and his thoughts turned to suicide - that he found out the test result was wrong.
On March 29, 1999, Davis Marc, a staff writer at The Virginian-Pilot reported that a 41-year-old shipyard electrician who was a good father took a routine blood test, ordered by the insurance company, and the results came back with shocking news: He had the AIDS virus. His life disintegrated. He started drinking. He missed work. His wife left with their three children. His in-laws harassed him. He thought he was dying. His wife thought she was dying.
Then came a second shock: The blood test was wrong. Goddard did not have HIV after all. It was a false positive. Today, Goddard and his wife are back together, but they are furious. They want to know why the blood test was wrong. They want to know why the insurance company refused to retest Goddard and clear his medical record for six months - until Goddard provided three negative blood tests from his own doctor.
The Telegram & Gazette reported on December 5, 2007 that 45-year old Audrey Serrano still has not shaken off the impact of living for years convinced that the virus that causes AIDS was steadily wreaking havoc inside her body. Ms. Serrano filed a lawsuit against a doctor who treated her after she was misdiagnosed as HIV positive in. She said the powerful combination of drugs she took for almost nine years triggered a string of ailments, including depression, chronic fatigue, the loss of weight and appetite, and an inflammation of the intestine. On January 28, 2008, Lawyers USA reported that a jury awarded Ms. Serrano $2.5 million in damages.
Recap on what causes AIDS:
According to Dr. Peter Duesberg, one of the world's leading retrovirologists, because HIV is a retrovirus, and retroviruses do not have cell-killing mechanisms, HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS. They (retroviruses) are latent, they do not "do" anything, and therefore could not possibly cause the massive cell destruction seen in AIDS. Studies done by USAID show that 5,500 people die each day of AIDS. These deaths are attributed to AIDS. In reality, they had tested positive for HIV and died of any of 29 AIDS-related diseases listed below. AIDS is simply a collection of diseases in the CDC database.
To test positive for HIV one has to harbor one or more of these "already known" 29 CDC pre-approved illnesses or conditions. (pop-up)
Long-term consumption of recreational drugs (such as cocaine, heroin, nitrite inhalants, and amphetamines) and prescriptions of DNA chain-terminating and other anti-HIV drugs, cause all AIDS diseases in America and Europe.
African AIDS is caused by Malnutrition, Parasitic infection and Poor sanitation.
Based on the research conducted, it wouldn't shock me if people draw the conclusion that AIDS is a collection of medical and political lies peddled around as actual Science by the medical and pharmaceutical cartel. Add Comments>>
Join the Newscast Media social networks
for current events and multimedia content.